Skip to content
PeptideRank

Evidence review

CJC-1295: What the Evidence Actually Shows

CJC-1295 IS the albumin-binding DAC modification — the compound's defining feature. What its discovery paper and human trial actually show.

Written by David ChenClinical Evidence & Regulatory Editor

CJC-1295 is a modified analog of the first 29 amino acids of human growth-hormone-releasing hormone (hGRF(1-29)), engineered for one specific purpose: to stay in circulation far longer than the native hormone does. Its own 2005 discovery paper is worth reading precisely, because "CJC-1295" isn't just a longer-acting GHRH fragment in some general sense — it's a specific chemical modification with a specific mechanism, and that mechanism is the entire reason the compound exists.

The DAC modification isn't a variant — it's the compound's own definition

Researchers at ConjuChem synthesized three maleimide derivatives of hGRF(1-29), each bioconjugated to human serum albumin, and tested them in rats1. The best-performing compound — the one the paper names CJC-1295 — carries an added N-epsilon-3-maleimidopropionamide-lysine group at its C-terminus, engineered specifically to form a covalent bond with the free thiol on albumin's Cys34 residue1. That's the "drug affinity complex" (DAC): once injected, CJC-1295 latches onto circulating albumin and rides along with it, dramatically extending how long it stays in the body. In the original rat pharmacokinetic work, CJC-1295 was detectable in plasma "beyond 72 h1," and produced a 4-fold increase in GH secretion (measured as area under the curve) over unmodified hGRF(1-29) in the first two hours after dosing1. This DAC mechanism is not an optional add-on version of CJC-1295 — per the compound's own naming paper, it's the defining feature that makes CJC-1295 CJC-1295.

What makes CJC-1295 CJC-1295

CJC-1295 (with DAC)

Maleimide group covalently bonds to albumin's free Cys34 thiol

Extended plasma presence

Detectable beyond 72h in rats; 5.8-8.1 day half-life in the human trial

Per the compound's own 2005 discovery paper — the albumin-binding modification IS the defining feature, not an optional variant.

The human trial — and why the half-life is measured in days, not hours

A real human trial followed: two randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, ascending-dose studies (28 and 49 days) in healthy adults aged 21-612. After a single CJC-1295 injection, mean plasma GH concentrations rose 2- to 10-fold for six days or more, and IGF-I rose 1.5- to 3-fold for 9-11 days2 — a dramatically longer duration than sermorelin's short-acting GHRH signal. The estimated half-life was 5.8-8.1 DAYS2 — not hours — direct human confirmation that the albumin-binding DAC mechanism identified in rats works the same way in people. After multiple doses, mean IGF-I levels stayed above baseline for up to 28 days, with evidence of a cumulative effect2. No serious adverse reactions were reported at the doses tested (30 or 60 mcg/kg)2.

Two different molecules sharing one market name

CJC-1295 (with DAC)"CJC-1295 no DAC" / Mod GRF 1-29
Human clinical trial dataYes — Teichman 2006 RCTNone — uncharacterized in human literature
Half-life5.8-8.1 daysShort — closer to unmodified hGRF(1-29)
MechanismAlbumin-bound via DAC modificationNo albumin-binding modification
On FDA's current 503A list?Not listed in Category 1, 2, or 3Not listed in Category 1, 2, or 3
Per a 2026 narrative review — the human trial data applies to the WITH-DAC form only.

A distinction worth knowing before buying anything labeled "CJC-1295"

Here's the finding that matters most for anyone actually encountering this compound in the market: what's commonly sold as "CJC-1295 without DAC" (often labeled "Mod GRF 1-29") is a genuinely different molecule — the same core peptide with the albumin-binding modification stripped back out, closer in kinetics to a short-acting GHRH fragment than to the long-acting molecule its own discovery paper describes. A 2026 narrative review states this distinction directly and, critically, reports what evidence exists for each variant separately: CJC-1295 WITH DAC has the real, placebo-controlled Teichman trial data behind it; CJC-1295 WITHOUT DAC "remains essentially uncharacterised in the peer-reviewed human literature... no controlled clinical studies have directly evaluated this compound in humans3." Every finding in this article — the 5.8-8.1 day half-life, the sustained IGF-I elevation — applies to the WITH-DAC molecule specifically. If a product is labeled "Mod GRF 1-29" or "CJC-1295 no DAC," none of that human trial data applies to it.

Regulatory status — reviewed and declined, not pending

A live, re-confirmed DailyMed search returns zero results for "CJC-1295" — no FDA-approved drug product exists in any form. FDA's Pharmacy Compounding Advisory Committee formally reviewed all five nominated CJC-1295 forms — free base, acetate, DAC free base, DAC acetate, and DAC trifluoroacetate — at its December 4, 2024 meeting, and its own briefing document proposes, item by item, that NONE be added to the federal 503A compounding bulk-substances list. One correction worth stating plainly, since some secondary sources get this wrong: CJC-1295 is not on FDA's Category 2 (significant-safety-risk) list. Reading FDA's current 503A document directly, Category 2 contains exactly six substances, and the one flagged there for a cardiac-type safety signal is ibutamoren mesylate — MK-677's salt form, a different, non-peptide compound entirely. CJC-1295 sits in none of the three nomination categories today; it's simply never cleared FDA's own effectiveness bar, not under active safety review.

What the FAERS record shows

A live openFDA FAERS check for CJC-1295 returns 4 total adverse-event reports — upper abdominal pain, acute kidney injury, elevated blood glucose, decreased blood potassium, drug hypersensitivity, and dysphagia, one report each. Four total reports is far too small a number to draw any conclusion from, reported here for completeness rather than as a signal either way.

What this means if you're considering it

CJC-1295 is a real, mechanistically well-characterized long-acting GHRH analog — but only in its original, DAC-conjugated form, which is the form its own 2005 discovery paper and the only real human trial behind it both describe. The far more common market variant, "CJC-1295 without DAC," has essentially no human clinical data of its own despite sharing the name. No FDA-approved product exists either way, and FDA's own compounding reviewers have already considered and declined to add any of its five forms to the federal bulks list. If you're evaluating it against the compound it's most often sold alongside, our CJC-1295/ipamorelin pairing article covers exactly that combination; our three-way sermorelin comparison goes deeper on how all three GH-axis peptides stack up. There is no dedicated CJC-1295 reconstitution calculator on this site today — an honest gap, since neither CJC-1295 variant has an FDA-set vial strength for a calculator to check anything against.

Top ranked on this board

Care Bare Rx

From $199/mo

Names both oral and injectable tirzepatide directly on its own product page, and states a regulatory category for its 4-pharmacy network — but two of those four named pharmacies carry real FDA warning letters, and the price is a floor, not a fixed figure.

See Care Bare Rx pricing

Partner

Pricing
Starting-at price
Pharmacy
503A pharmacy
Labs
Required

Advertising disclosure — we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. See our disclosure.

Also worth knowing

Breeze Meds

Its own nav menu names Tirzepatide Injection as a real, distinct product — but pricing is quiz-gated to a category-wide "starting at" figure, and no pharmacy category is stated.

See Breeze Meds

Partner

Frequently asked questions

What does the DAC in CJC-1295 stand for, and does it matter?

DAC stands for drug affinity complex — a chemical modification that lets CJC-1295 covalently bond to circulating serum albumin, extending its half-life to 5.8-8.1 days in the human trial. It's not an optional variant; per the compound's own 2005 discovery paper, that albumin-binding mechanism is the defining feature that makes CJC-1295 CJC-1295, distinct from unmodified GHRH fragments.

Is "CJC-1295 without DAC" the same compound?

No, and this matters for anyone buying it. A 2026 narrative review states that CJC-1295 without DAC (commonly sold as Mod GRF 1-29) "remains essentially uncharacterised in the peer-reviewed human literature" — the real human trial data (the Teichman 2006 RCT) applies only to the original, DAC-conjugated molecule.

Is CJC-1295 on FDA's Category 2 safety-risk list?

No — a live check of FDA's current 503A Bulks List (updated May 14, 2026) confirms CJC-1295 is not in Category 1, 2, or 3. The compound actually listed in Category 2 for a cardiac-type safety signal is ibutamoren mesylate (MK-677's salt form), a different, non-peptide compound sometimes confused with CJC-1295.

Is CJC-1295 FDA-approved?

No. A live DailyMed search returns zero results for CJC-1295 in any form. FDA's Pharmacy Compounding Advisory Committee reviewed all five nominated forms in December 2024 and proposed against adding any of them to the 503A compounding bulk-substances list.

Does this site have a CJC-1295 reconstitution calculator?

No. There's no dedicated CJC-1295 calculator on this site today — an honest gap, since neither CJC-1295 variant has an FDA-set vial strength for a calculator to check anything against.

References

  1. Jetté L, Léger R, Thibaudeau K, Benquet C, Robitaille M, Pellerin I, Paradis V, van Wyk P, Pham K, Bridon DP (2005). Human growth hormone-releasing factor (hGRF)1-29-albumin bioconjugates activate the GRF receptor on the anterior pituitary in rats: identification of CJC-1295 as a long-lasting GRF analog. Endocrinology. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15817669/
  2. Teichman SL, Neale A, Lawrence B, Gagnon C, Castaigne JP, Frohman LA (2006). Prolonged stimulation of growth hormone (GH) and insulin-like growth factor I secretion by CJC-1295, a long-acting analog of GH-releasing hormone, in healthy adults. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16352683/
  3. Dominikowski A, et al. (2026). The emerging landscape of performance-enhancing peptides modulating GH-IGF1 axis: bridging the gap between clinical evidence and patient self-administration — states CJC-1295 without DAC "remains essentially uncharacterised in the peer-reviewed human literature". Frontiers in Endocrinology. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42395176/
  4. U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (2024). FDA Briefing Document — Pharmacy Compounding Advisory Committee (PCAC) Meeting, December 4, 2024: CJC-1295-Related Bulk Drug Substances — FDA proposing that CJC-1295 (free base), CJC-1295 acetate, and all three CJC-1295 DAC forms NOT be included on the 503A Bulks List. FDA.gov — Pharmacy Compounding Advisory Committee briefing materials. https://www.fda.gov/media/183583/download
  5. U.S. Food and Drug Administration (2026). Bulk Drug Substances Nominated for Use in Compounding Under Section 503A of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Categories 1, 2, and 3) — CJC-1295 not listed in any category; Category 2 contains Cesium Chloride, Domperidone, Germanium Sesquioxide, Ibutamoren Mesylate, Kisspeptin-10, and Quinacrine Hydrochloride (intrauterine) only, updated May 14, 2026. FDA.gov. https://www.fda.gov/media/94155/download
  6. U.S. Food and Drug Administration (2026). FAERS adverse event reports naming CJC-1295 (4 total reports; reaction terms: abdominal pain upper, acute kidney injury, blood glucose increased, blood potassium decreased, drug hypersensitivity, dysphagia). openFDA — drug/event public API. https://api.fda.gov/drug/event.json?search=patient.drug.medicinalproduct:%22CJC-1295%22

Medical disclaimer: This content is for general educational purposes only and is not medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. Always consult a licensed healthcare professional before starting, stopping, or changing any treatment.